Borklog: One entry


22 January 2002

Denshi on #openacs pointed me to Paul Graham's site. I'm reading an article on Java's Cover, a critique of Java's "cover" (as in a judging a book by its cover). Includes
2. It's aimed low. In the original Java white paper, Gosling explicitly says Java was designed not to be too difficult for programmers used to C. It was designed to be another C++: C plus a few ideas taken from more advanced languages. Like the creators of sitcoms or junk food or package tours, Java's designers were consciously designing a product for people not as smart as them
and
9. It's designed for large organizations. Large organizations have different aims from hackers. They want languages that are (believed to be) suitable for use by large teams of mediocre programmers-- languages with features that, like the speed limiters in U-Haul trucks, prevent fools from doing too much damage.

admin@badgertronics.com